Business Methods Allowance Checklist
- Useful, concrete, and tangible result.
- Not a judicial exception per se.
- Not just data per se.
- Not simply automating a known or obvious process on a computer or on the internet.
- Not a computer program per se.
- Not merely non-functional data on a storage device, i.e., music on a cd.
- If functional signal is being claimed, must be statically embedded in a computer-readable medium.
- The feature that appears to distinguish over the prior art does not merely appear in a recitation of intended use, the name or title of a feature or in non-functional descriptive material.
- Searches for analogous art related to the distinguishing feature were conducted.
- The meanings attributed to the words of the claim are the plain, ordinary, meanings unless criteria for a special definition have been met.
*You must be able to answer yes to all of these statements.
Blending IP strategy with disruptive innovation theory, this blog aims to help inventors, managers, and IP professionals improve their strategic edge.
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
PTO's Checklist for Business Method Patents
If you file a patent that has the misfortune of being treated as a "business method patent" by the PTO - meaning that it is in Class 705 - then there is a special checklist that the PTO will use during prosecution. Check out the Business Methods Allowance Checklist - one of several valuable resources on the PTO's page on business methods.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment